# Complex Reasoning Practice for IBPS RRB

## Complex Reasoning Practice for IBPS RRB

Directions (Q. 1-5): Study the following information carefully and answer the given questions.
Eight persons from different companies, viz Tata, Mahindra, Hyundai, Maruti, Toyota, BMW, Skoda and Mercedes, are sitting in two parallel rows containing four persons each in such a way that there is an equal distance between adjacent persons. In row 1, P, Q, R and S are sitting and all of them are facing north. In row 2, A, B, C and D are sitting and all of them are facing south. Therefore, in the given seating arrangement each member sitting in a row faces another member of the other row. (All the information given above does not necessarily represent the order of seating as in the final arrangement.)
The person from Toyota faces the one who sits on the immediate left of R.  R is neither from Mahindra nor from Hyundai. An immediate neighbour of A faces the person from Tata. The person from BMW faces the person who sits on the left of the person from Mahindra.  There is only one person sitting between the persons from Mahindra and Skoda but that person is not R.
The persons from Mahindra and Hyundai are not sitting at the extreme ends.  B sits on the immediate left of the person from Toyota. The persons from Maruti and BMW are immediate neighbours. C and Q are not sitting at any of the ends. S faces the one who is sitting on the immediate right of the person from BMW. A is not from BMW or Maruti. P does not face BMW.

1. Who among the following is from Mercedes?
1) A
2) R
3) B
4) S
5) Can’t be determined

2. R is from which of the following companies?
1) Skoda
2) Tata
3) Maruti
4) BMW
5) None of these

3. Who is sitting between D and the person from Toyota?
1) The person who is from Hyundai
2) B
3) S
4) The person who faces the one who is from Hyundai
5) None of these

4. Who among the following faces the one who is from BMW?
1) The person who is from Mahindra
2) R
3) S
4) The person who is from Mercedes
5) Q

5. Who among the following sit on the extreme ends of the row?
1) B and the person from Hyundai
2) The persons from Skoda and Toyota
3) The persons from Tata and BMW
4) S and the person from Mahindra
5) D and B

Directions (Q. 6-10): In each question below are given two or more statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Give answer
1) if only conclusion I follows.
2) if only conclusion II follows.
3) if either conclusion I or II follows.
4) if neither conclusion I nor II follows.
5) if both conclusions I and II follow.

6. Statements: Some doctors are MBBS.
All MBBS are dentists.
No dentist is an MBA.
Conclusions:
I. Some doctors are not MBAs.
II. Some MBBS are MBAs.

7. Statements: All plants are trees.
Some trees are branches.
All roots are branches.
Conclusions:
I. All roots being plants is a possibility.
II. All branches being roots is a possibility.

8. Statements: All schools are colleges.
All schools are universities.
No university is Oxford.
Conclusions:
I. All universities are colleges.
II. No school is Oxford.

9. Statements: No day is a date.
Some dates are months.
All months are years.
Conclusions:
I. Some months are definitely not days.
II. At least some years are dates.

10. Statements: No poet is a writer.
Some writers are players.
No player is a producer.
Conclusions:
I. Some producers are definitely not poets.
II. At least some poets are players.